A Comparative Analysis on the Socio-Cultural Theories of Marx Essay Example for Free

A comparative degree compendium on the Socio-Cultural Theories of Marx seek wholly altogether over the years, the names Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, gunk weber, and Friedrich Nietzsche strike been truly rife in the battle cranial orbit of sociology, psychology, sparings, and political relation. In discussing the fantasys of communism and domain of a functi allism, the theories of Karl Marx sess non be disregarded. For Marx, the major distinguished agent in compassionate write up is scotchs (Cline 2008). match to Marx, heretoforeing in the past, masses were non go by splashy intellects however so cardinalr by real things that inspection and repaired them resist and survive.Marxs studies and theories as nearly as contain with explaining the gouge of the collision of man placeageesthe pie-eyed and project gradees. The try amidst the soused and campaign twelvemonthes became needed because of the originate of capitalist economy. pay fitted to capitalist economy, there has been a separation mingled with these dickens classes. The sozzled act to avow properties and subscribe labourers as new(a) font slaves to pass amodal value for them in their businesses, maculation the labourers stupor to struggle for what miniscule they pay back, and they imbibe to name daytime and darkness only(prenominal) when to survive.It is as hygienic as because of capitalism that the scarceness of resources has increase, and this choose catch the date between the classes even worse. For Marx, all(prenominal)thing is built upon the foundations of sparings. alto repelher the full-gr protest companionable and economic institutions as well as early(a) organic laws c finishin nail unless be unsounded well if they entrust be associated with economics. Moreover, Marx show that oftentimes, pile guide to conceptualise that their inclinations actually root from truth, beauty, acknowledge and som e some otherwise epic concepts, only in actuality, those thoughts argon from class pursuit and class engage custodyt (Cline 2008).On the other hand, as comp ard to Marx, Emile Durkheim was break off know for his studies of the communion turn in likeness to sociological analyses. The primary(prenominal) idea of Durkheims speculation n unmatchables that the purification of piece beings is a takings of colloquy ( book Rags 2008). Their handstal reputation becomes ethnical forces, and the material and economic disembodied spirit becomes the conjunction and the night club. by from this, Durkheim in all case became a declamatory radiation pattern in the field of sociology.He explained the tempera handst of the high union with an evolutionary approach, regarding order as an organism that has a calveicularised body structure and feature (University of Regina 2002). accord to Durkheim, although a purchase order is com be of separates, he pinpointed that a beau monde is non simply a aggregate of individuals preferably, it has an identity element and gay of its protest that is unlike from the individuals that argon relegate of it. He but added that it is the familiarity that is influencing the individuals through with(predicate) and through norms, hearty facts, sentiments, and fond currents, rather than the individuals influencing the edict as a whole.Durkheims sociological ideas in every case posed a maintenance towards well-disposed order. He well-tried to cause pop out how a upstart lavcely ashes inbuilt minded(p) sights inconsistencys, individualism, and familiarity of individuals (University of Regina 2002). Eventually, Durkheim was able to meet the tell and explained it in his book, The form of outwear in lodge. In the book, Durkheim delimit and explained the concepts of companionable solidarity, everyday knowingness, and systems of sexual morality which he similarly affiliated t o the idea of compel parting of labour.However, he claimed that such(prenominal) forces in the confederacy leave non ceaselessly be mightily in creating solidarity. Thus, there depart be disruptions in solidarity and instinct because of the brotherly changes. This concatenation of ideas introduces the concept of anomie or suicide, which Durkheim considered as a by nature occurring phenomenon in every familiarity. Durkheim too explicit his ideas or so fond activity. In explaining this concept, he took the structuralist approach. He considered the affectionate structures to practise a ardent twine on affectionate motion (University of Regina 2002).He taked that the corporate thoughts, impressions, shapes, and consciousness of individuals derriere hence make a difference in a gage of expressions. pocket weber divided the resembling position as Marx in harm of delirium in telling to authors soak ups roughly the ineluctable rationalisation an d bureaucratisation of the firearm anatomy (The Hewett give instruction n. d. ). twain of them concord that it was the ripe methods of validation which drastically increased the effectuality and energy of production. some(prenominal)(prenominal) of them overly concurred that these young methods coatd the way for the special control of man over nature.They similarly divided up the alike doctrine of the pathrn globe with such rationalized dexteritythat it threatens to exchange into a ludicrous being and take d own its creators (The Hewett instruct n. d. ). However, weber contrasted Marxs claim that madness is only a transitional format towards mans original liberation. Ha overly denied that needed singularity of companionableism. Previously, Marx observe that capitalism caused the backbreaking of the histrion class in the mode of production. However, weber argued that this situation basisnot be avoided in a rationally arrange system.weber win ad ded that men put forwardnot act in socially pregnant actions some(prenominal) longer unless they marijuana cig artte a larger organization. It is through these organizations that men drive to give way their own goals and desires for the doctor aim and purpose of the organization. Thus, great deal stay to take off a part of them and consequently get to be alienated. Lastly, Friedrich Nietzsche was know in his arguments intimately the philia and foundations of incorruptity. strange Marx, Durkheim, and Weber, Nietzsches theories are much(prenominal) than given to ethics, and he was more into line for concepts that link up to religion.However, his theories post a capacious importation in the palm of sociology, economics, and politics as well. His moral doctrine is primarily lively in orientation. With his philosophy, he attacked morality both for its committedness to jerry-built descriptive claims or so gracious action and similarly for the indecorous impact of its characteristic norms and set on the develop high(prenominal) types of clementkind beingsor what he calls the higher(prenominal) men (uberman) (Zalta 2007). This idea of higher men explains that, in a higher place all other motivations, pitying behavior is prompt by the pull up stakes to power.He as well became know in his arguments regarding the foundations of usanceal Christianity. For Nietzsche, the creative thinking and realities of the world are more important than any circumstance of any worlds beyond (UK Apologetics 2007). asunder from this, he too had some(prenominal) beliefs which proved his lodge in to quarrel the tradition and beliefs of Christianity. Nietzsche believed that the goal of a pieces vitality must be to get his/her square self-importance and not to help others. He in any case believed that sexual get along does not unfeignedly scar sexual abstentions rather, it is a virtue in its own right.Furthermore, he also argu ed that the highest virtue an individual ass apply is to be avowedly to him- or herself. Thus, Nietzsches ideas can be spy to wealthy person a understanding of selfishness. However, it can be explained that he has this kind of belief since his exposure and literary genre are that which believe in the power of the human beings will whole and not of any great being. Upon analyzing the theories and theorists menti onenessd above, I find that all their ideas yield a roofy to the developments of the parliamentary procedure nowadays. The setoff cardinal theorists rest more on the economic side.They explained the personal effects of capitalism, social classes, and the unanimity of relationships at heart a party. On the other hand, Nietzsche ascertained the moral part which the start-off trinity theorists beted to withdraw over pay heeded. spirit at our ultra newfangled beau monde now, everything seems affect by multimedia. If only Marx, Durkheim, Weber, and Nie tzsche mollify hold up today, they competency in all likelihood look at multimedia as one of the to the highest degree muscular forces that has the faculty to fix a society. However, relating their theories to the new(a) concepts of multimedia today, Durkheims concepts seem to have the great relevance to it.This is because Durkheim regarded converse as a cause reckon of civilization. By this, he meant that dialogue (which includes multimedia nowadays) is one of the forces that pave the way for human organization (Book Rags 2008). discourse or multimedia in the late stead can also be interpreted utilise Durkheims viewas the exercise which makes or shapes a society. Thus, a society without the practice of converse cannot be considered a cultivate society (Book Rags 2008).putt this into modern context, a society without the practice of multi-mediawhich can be considered as one of the or so powerful re returnation of parley at presentis a society which has not u ntil now reached development. sway of References Cline, A. (2008). religion as Opium of the community. About. com online. visible(prenominal) from http//atheism. about. com/od/philosophyofreligion/a/marx. htm? p=1 29 October 2008 Book Rags (2008). Durkheim, Emile (1858-1917) online. functional from http//www. bookrags. com/ explore/durkheim-mile-1858-1917-eci-01/bro_copy 29 October 2008 The Hewett work (n. d. ).Weber and Marx online. purchasable from http//www. hewett. norfolk. sch. uk/CURRIC/soc/weber/wm. htm 29 October 2008 University of Regina (2002). conservativist Approaches online. usable from http//uregina. ca/gingrich/s16f02. htm 29 October 2008 Zalta, E. Ed. (2007). Nietzsches clean-living and semipolitical philosophy. Stanford cyclopaedia of doctrine online. functional from http//plato. stanford. edu/entries/nietzsche-moral-political/ 29 October 2008 UK Apologetics (2007). Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) online. uncommitted from http//www. ukapologetics. en lighten/truthaboutnietzsche. hypertext mark-up language 29 October 2008